Comparative Analysis of A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner and Luck Essay

Comparative Analysis of A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner and Luck by Mark bracing - Essay ExampleThe presence of a universal characteristic in literary cooks alike means that there are also texts that provide scenarios, feelings, thoughts, or experiences that are unique and not undergo by the majority.In this paper, a comparison of two unawares stories is provided as an illustration of Johnsons point in elucidating the meaning of just representations of general nature. The literary texts included in the comparative analysis are A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner and Luck by Mark Twain. The choice for these texts is motivated mainly by the level of representativeness of each. That is, Faulkners pitiable story is identified as more universal in its theme, while Twains equally entertaining short story differs from Faulkners because of its unique quality.The discussion and analysis posits, then, that A Rose is an example of a literary give that possesses the representativene ss quality that Johnson talks about because of its utilization of societys hostility of an individual because Emily chose to deviate from the norms of her connection. Meanwhile, Twains Luck lacks the universality that Faulkners work has because luck is an uncommon phenomenon, not universally experienced by people throughout their life, as remote to what was illustrated in the life of the storys primary subject, Lt. Gen. Arthur Scoresby. Emily Grierson is depicted as a social outcast in the community that she lived in, setting the mood early on in Faulkners short story. The relationship between the community and Emily was angiotensin converting enzyme that bordered between hostility and indifference while most of the people in the community had considered Emily as an individual who lived in the past (i.e., trying to live the affluent life that she had when she was young), and thus they became indifferent, even uninterested, in her, there were slightly members of the community who reveled on the fact that there lived a woman in their fructify that does not fit the image of a pleasant community member. This relationship is effectively illustrated by the narrators description of peoples behavior during her funeral our unanimous town went to her funeral the men through a sort of respectful affection for a fallen monument, the women broadly out of curiosityThe fact that Emily managed to survive on her own and with the help of her servant, Tobe, is not the only arcanum that intrigued her community. Despite her denial to admit that she lives in poverty at the time of her death, another mystery that remained was the share of Emilys relationship with Homer Barron, her supposed fianc who had suddenly disappeared from the community and Emilys life. Emilys pervert behavior was indeed confirmed when it was revealed by and by in the story that she was both poor and a murderer, having killed Homer when he denied her of her love for him. Though deviant in nature, the communitys treatment of Emily as a deviant is a universal experience among us. At some point in our lives, we had experienced fair or unfair persecution by our society and community, and Faulkners effective and new portrayal of this theme through Emily and her community makes the short story truly representative of humanitys behavior and nature.The intellectual for Lucks lack of representativeness or universality to humanitys general experience in life is because the story pore on the phenomenon of luck, which is not only uncommon, but an unpopular phenomenon in a human society that is soon dominated by the ideology of rationality, logic, and science. Embodied by the character of Scoresby, luck