Childrens Morality Vs. How Moral Are You? :: essays research papers

A response Paper to How Moral atomic number 18 You? by Kohlberg, L. (1963) The Develop handst of childrens preferenceof moral thought & Telling The Truth by Barasch, Douglas S.(Family Life)I present both of these articles and engraft them to be interesting. In the first article, How Moral Are You? published in Forty Studies that changed Psychology IV by Roger R. Hock, what is discussed is Lawrence Kohlbergs research on the formation of morality. Kohlberg believed the ability to moralize situations encountered in vivification develops in a specific pattern during our childhood years. He believed that a child must reach a certain defend and mentality in order to create a level of morality. I found the information he presented was interesting. Things such as each stage a child undergoes increases the understanding of the concept of morality and the stages always occur in a step-by-step pattern. Kohlberg reasoned the stages are prepotent, meaning the child understands any stage that he/she has been through and a vague idea of the stage above them (197). As for how he researched his theory, the process seems simple enough. He supplied children of distinguishable ages with 10 hypothetical moral dilemmas(197). I found myself answering the questions to the highest degree moral issues with confusion. The question that was most difficult to answer was the Heinz Dilemma in which a man commits a crime to save his wife from dying. I would forgive his the husband actions because the druggist was being unfair in his offering cost for his medicine. That kind of druggist shouldnt be allowed to be creating drugs anywayhis business is to aid people not the antithesis.I enjoyed reading this article precisely conceived of a few flaws in his theory that he Kohlberg did not conduct though many other critiques did. The glitches in his theory were such as although Kohlberg represents an interpretation of morality, most of these ideas represent Western cultures and faile d to bind to non-Western cultures. It was also difficult to apply his theory equally for both men and women. He did a wonderful job of explaining morality even though it would not stand up on its own in the years to come.The second article I read, I found to be similar to my first in the fact that they both discussed moral argument of children and different so-called stages. It was published by Douglas S. Barasch in the 1998 February issue of the magazine, Family Life.